Welcome to site of Scientific Works of NDFI (demo).

№ 1/2023

Nauk. pr. NDFI 2023 (1): 43–55https://doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2023.01.043

FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC REGULATION

SHERGINA Lidiia ¹, RIEPIN Kyrylo ²

¹Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9031-0616
²Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8741-5342

Theoretical background of the organization of ecological entrepreneurship in the context of sustainable development concept

The article is devoted to an in-depth study of scientific approaches and laws of the organization of ecological entrepreneurship. The relationship between the provisions of the concept of sustainable development and the need to organize ecological entrepreneurship and economy with the natural environment is outlined. The possibilities of business in the green economy regarding the formation of the effect, the creation of “ecological business” taking into account the concept of sustainable development are substantiated. The author sets tasks that must be solved in the development of ecological concepts related to ecological and economic problems. The author's vision of the concept of “ecological entrepreneurship” is presented in the context of scientific consideration of ecological and economic tasks based on the innovation process and aimed at protecting the ecosystem and people. The author recommends determining the essence of “ecological entrepreneurship” using ecosystem, eco-innovation, organizational, standardization and global approaches. The author of the article proposed an adapted organizational base for evaluating the structure, processes, influencing factors and effectiveness of the development of ecological entrepreneurship. According to the author, the development of ecological entrepreneurship is a global challenge, therefore it is necessary to focus on supporting the integrity of the economic and ecological system by developing and implementing effective measures for organizing and conducting business without harming the environment. The development of ecological entrepreneurship can become a guide on the way to sustainable economic development of the country as well as of the most countries of the world.

Keywords:sustainable development, ecological entrepreneurship, ecological business, organization, ecosystem

JEL: B41, Q01, Q56

Shergina L. . Theoretical background of the organization of ecological entrepreneurship in the context of sustainable development concept / L. Shergina , K. Riepin // Наукові праці НДФІ. - 2023. - № 1. - C. 43-55.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 43 - 55)

Download

Downloads :98

1. Robbins, L. A (1998). History of Economic Thought. The LSE Lectures. Princeton University Press. Retrieved from coollib.net/b/442612-layonel-robbins-istoriya-ekonomicheskoy-myisli/read#t6.
2. Ricardo, D. (1951). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. (3rd Ed.). In Sraffa, P., & Dobb, M. H. 1821 from The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from www.econlib.org/library/Ricardo/ricP.html.
3. Marx, K. (1989). Theories of Surplus Value. In Contained in the Collected Works of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, vol. 32. New York: International Publishers.
4. Stamp, J. C. (1927). Industrial Fluctuations. By Arthur Cecil Pigou, professor of Political Economy in the University of Cambridge. (Macmillan & Co. Ltd. 1927. 397 p.). The Economic Journal, 37 (147), 418–424. doi.org/10.2307/2223555
5. Kuznets, S. S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequalit. The American economic Review, XLV (1). Retrieved from assets.aeaweb.org/asset-server/files/9438.pdf.
6. Schumpeter, J. A. (1954). History of Economic Analysis. London: George Allen & Unwin. Retrieved from digamo.free.fr/schumphea.pdf.
7. Albrecht, J. (2002). Environmental Issue Entrepreneurship: A Schumpeterian Perspective. Futures, Vol. 34 (7), 649–661. doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(02)00006-X
8. Quinn, J. (1971, September – October). Next Big Industry: Environmental Improvement. Harvard Business Review, 120–131.
9. Berle, G. (1991). The Green Entrepreneur: Business Opportunities that Can Save the Earth and Make You Money. Liberty Hall Press.
10. Bennett, S. J. (1991). Ecopreneuring: The Complete Guide to Small Business Opportunities from the Environmental Revolution. New York: John Wiley.
11. Isaak, R. (1997). Globalization and Green Entrepreneurship. Greener Management International, 18 (18), 80–90.
12. Anderson, A. (1998). Cultivating the Garden of Eden: Environmental Entrepreneuring. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11 (2), 135–144. doi.org/10.1108/09534819810212124
13. Keogh, P. D., & Polonsky, M. J. (1998). Environmental Commitment: A Basis for Environmental Entrepreneurship? Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11 (1), 38–49. Ddoi.org/10.1108/09534819810369563
14. Patakia, A. (1998). Grassroots Ecopreneurs: Change Agents for a Sustainable Society. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11 (2), 157–173. doi.org/10.1108/09534819810212142
15. Schaltegger, S. (2002). Framework for Ecopreneurship: Leading Bioneers and Environmental Managers to Ecopreneurship. Greener Management International, 38, 45–58. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/greemanainte.38.45.
16. Gibbs, D. (2006). Sustainability Entrepreneurs, Ecopreneurs and the Development of a Sustainable Economy. Greener Management International, 55, 63–78. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/publication/263114808_Sustainability_Entrepreneurs_Ecopreneurs_and_the_Development_of_a_Sustainable_Economy.
17. Beveridge, R., & Guy, S. (2005). The Rise of the Eco-Preneur and the Messy World of Environmental Innovation. Local Environment, 10 (6), 665–676. doi.org/10.1080/13549830500321972
18. Dean, T. J., & McMullen, J. S. (2007). Toward a Theory of Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Reducing Environmental Degradation Through Entrepreneurial Action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22 (1), 50–76. doi.org/10.1080/13549830500321972
19. Schlange, L. E. (2009). Stakeholder Identification in Sustainability Entrepreneurship. Greener Management International, 55, 13–32. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/greemanainte.55.13.
20. Parris, D. L., & McInnis-Bowers, C. (2014). Social Entrepreneurship Questioning the Status Quo: Waste as a Resource. Journal of Economic Issues, 48 (2), 359–365. doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624480209
21. Kirkwood, J., & Walton, S. (2010). How Ecopreneurs’ Green Values Affect Their International Engagement in Supply Chain Management. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 8, 200–217. doi.org/10.1007/s10843-010-0056-8
22. Kirkwood, J., & Walton, S. (2010). What Motivates Ecopreneurs to Start Businesses? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 16 (3), 204–228. doi.org/10.1108/13552551011042799
23. Kirkwood, J., & Walton, S. (2014). How Green is Green? Ecopreneurs Balancing Environmental Concerns and Business Goals. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 21 (1), 37–51. doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2014.880384
24. Lovinska, L., Oliynyk, Ya., & Kucheriava, M. (2020). Methodological approaches to assessing companies contribution to the implementation of SDGs and counteraction to COVID-19. Finance of Ukraine, 10, 47–63 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2020.10.047
25. Moore, J. (1996). The Death of Competition: Leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. New York: Harper Business.
26. Erkko, A., & Llewellyn, T. (2014). Innovation ecosystems: implications for innovation management. In Dodgson, M., Gann, D. M., & Phillips, N. (Eds.). (2014). Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management, pp. 204–228. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/publication/282122544_Innovation_Ecosystems_Implications_for_Innovation_Management.
27. Teece, D. J. (2017). Dynamic capabilities and (digital) platform lifecycles. Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Platforms, Advances in Strategic Management, 37, 227–297. doi.org/10.1108/S0742-332220170000037008
28. Brown, R., Mason, C., & Mawson, S. (2014). Increasing “The Vital 6 Percent”: Designing Effective Public Policy to Support High Growth Firms. Nesta Working Paper, 14/01. Retrieved from www.academia.edu/16858150/Increasing_the_vital_6_per_cent_designing_effective_public_policy_to_support_high_growth_firms.
29. Doroshchuk, H. A. (2016). Management of organizational development: theoretical and conceptual foundations. Odesa: Bondarenko O. M. [in Ukrainian].
30. Borysov, T. M., & Monastyrskyi, H. L. (2020). Institutional foundations and marketing imperatives of sustainable development. Ternopil: Ekonomicna dumka WUNU [in Ukrainian].
31. Kupalova, H. I. (2011). Ecological entrepreneurship as an integral component of sustainable development of Ukraine. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Military-special sciences, 26, 35–39 [in Ukrainian].
32. Kovalev, A. I. (2006). Management of enterprise restructuring. Kyiv: AVRIO [in Russian].
33. Oliynyk, Ya., & Kucheriava, M. (2019). Improvement of legislation for non-financial reporting in Ukraine as the result of cooperation with international institutions. Finance of Ukraine, 11, 31–43 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2019.11.031
34. Matos, P. (2020). ESG and Responsible Institutional Investing Around the World: A Critical Review. Lviv: Lviv Polytechnic Publishing House [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3668998
35. Iefymenko, T., Lovinska, L., Oliynyk, Ya., & Kucheriava, M. (2020). Enterprise reporting on sustainable development in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Kyiv: SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”. Retrieved from afu.kiev.ua/getfile.php?page_id=1030&num=1 [in Ukrainian].