№ 1/2020

№ 1/2020

Nauk. pr. NDFI 2020 (1): 145–159https://doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2020.01.145

FINANCES OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE

DEMYDENKO Roman ¹

¹SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6508-9577

Norming of scientific and researching labour: conceptual sources

The study is dedicated to the problems of standardization and quality management of scientific labour that is characterized as a highly creative and undefined. It is signified that the unified international approach on collection and processing of scientific information would influence many spheres of science. Particularly the opportunity to enhance the level of efficiency of quantitative and qualitative results of scientific researches performance could be fulfilled by implementing theoretical and methodological components of the norming of scientific and researching labour (NSRL) conception. Supporting previous contribution of observed issues it has to be agreed with the hypothesis that a partial evaluation of human resource in research and development environment could take place although the complexity of external appearances of creativity of the scientist. Generally NSRL conception is prescribing the prospective ability to stimulate the evolution of intellectual capital in the sphere of R&D. The concept of NSRL consists of the definition, triad of principles of implementation and performance, interconnection of NSRL functions and R&D management components, NSRL cyclic process of application, stakeholders` environment with NSRL roles allocation, terminal and level effects clarification of NSRL utilization and division of NSRL priorities. NSRL might be identified as few objective senses like policy, practice, culture. Adaptation of concept is being highly applicable because of the analogy in production industrial sphere, where exact instruments made a notable impact on human resource stimulation. Generalizing the study few suggestions on implementation and further evolution of the topic were declarated. One of the strong directions is the possibility to shape management accounting techniques for the analysis in scientific sphere. Appropriate cost optimization would cause incremental changes on the way of obtaining various investments because of the increase of reporting transparency. Another branch of efforts is lead by project management ideas is the sphere innovation and standardization projects.

Keywords:norming of scientific and researching labour (NSRL), research and development (R&D), standardization of scientific researches effectiveness and efficiency assessment, scientific and researching labour standardization, intellectual capital, quality management and accounting in scientific sector, innovational development project management

JEL: H83, I22, I23, I28, L15, M49, M51, M52, M54,

DEMYDENKO R. . Norming of scientific and researching labour: conceptual sources / R. DEMYDENKO // Наукові праці НДФІ. - 2020. - № 1. - C. 145-159.

Article original in English (pp. 145 - 159)

Download

Downloads :277

1. OECD. (2015). Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities.doi.org/10.1787/9789264239012-en
2. Toffler, E. (2000). The Third wave. Kyiv: Vsesvit [in Ukrainian].
3. Iefymenko, T. I. (2017). Some aspects of the public discussion of a draft Medium Term Plan of Priority Actions until 2020. Finance of Ukraine. 1, 7–9. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2017.01.007
4. Bohdan, I. V., & Konovalenko, D. V. (2018). International comparisons of researcher’s labor productivity and macroeconomic effects of research and development. Finance of Ukraine, 12, 52–71.doi.org/10.33763/finukr2018.12.052
5. UNESCO. (1978, November 28) Records of the General Conference, 20th session. Retrieved from unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000114032.page=188.
6. Emerson, H. (1912). The twelve principles of efficiency. Retrieved from archive.org/details/twelveprinciples00emerrich/page/n19/mode/2up.
7. Machlup, F. (1962). The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States. Princeton University Press.
8. Pavliuk, K. V. (2019). Methodical approaches to the evaluation of the quality of scientific research. RFI Scientific Papers, 2, 5–17. doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2019.02.005
9. Rainova, L. B. (2018). Formula funding of higher education in EU countries. RFI Scientific Papers, 2, 133–145. doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2018.02.133
10. Pavliuk, K.V. (2019). Problems of evaluation of scientific activity. RFI Scientific Papers, 4, 5–19. doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2019.04.005
11. Tochylina, I. V. (2018). International expierence of tax incentives for higher education development. RFI Scientific Papers, 3, 48–64. Retrieved from npndfi.org.ua/?page_id=723&aid=943 [in Ukrainian].
12. Sokolovska, A. M. (2018). Discussion aspects of formula distribution of state expenditure on higher education in Ukraine. Finance of Ukraine, 5, 8–21.doi.org/10.33763/finukr2018.05.008
13. Kaminska, O. S. (2018). Rationing of scientific research work and its role in efficiency and quality improving of scientific research work. RFI Scientific Papers, 4, 94–105.doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2018.04.094
14. Pavliuk, K. V., Kaminska, O. S. (2019). Foreign experience of assessing the quality of scientific activity. RFI Scientific Papers, 3, 25–40. doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2019.03.025
15. Korytnyk, L. P. (2019). Conceptual principles of forming budgets in management accounting of higher education institutions. Finance of Ukraine, 8, 75–88. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2019.08.075
16. Gasanov, S. S., Kotlyarevskyy, Ya. V., Melnikov, A. V., Kniaziev, S. I., Shtangret A. M., & Semenyuk, E. P. Gasanov, S.S. (2019). Methodological Approaches to Labor Norming in Scholarly Research and Development. Science and Innovations, 15, 5–27. doi.org/10.15407/scin15.01.005
17. Gasanov, S. S. (2019). Research and development (R&D) in the national economy structure: trends of employment, expenditures and funding. RFI Scientific Papers, 1, 5–17. doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2019.01.005
18. Gasanov, S.S. (2018). Research and development (R&D) in the national economy structure: connections with government functions. RFI Scientific Papers, 3, 5–17. doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2018.04.005
19. Taylor, F. W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. Retrieved from sites.ualberta.ca/~yreshef/orga432/docs/TaylorScientificManagement.pdf.
20. Babenko, A. H., & Bondarevska, K. V. (2013). Labour norming: educational handbook. Dnipropetrovsk: Dnipropetrovsk State Financial Academy [in Ukrainian].
21. Chase, R. B. (2008). Operations Management for Competitive Advantage. Moscow: Viliams [in Russian].
22. Chervaniov, D. M., & Zhylinska, O. I. (2001). Cross-discipline vocabulary of management. Kyiv: Nichlava [in Ukrainian].
23. Lopatynska, L. A. (2019). Modern level of evolution of methodology and methods of scientific labour norms creation. RFI Scientific Papers, 3, 41–50. doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2019.03.041
24. Iefymenko, T. I., Gasanov, S. S., Bogdan, I. V. (2018). State budget expenditures on higher education: structural changes and formula allocation problem. Bulletin of Kyiv National University of Technology and Design. Series: Economic Sciences. Retrieved from er.knutd.edu.ua/handle/123456789/10114 [in Ukrainian].
25. Pavliuk, K.V. (2019). Interrelation of research findings and financing of science: foreign experience. Finance of Ukraine, 3, 73–91. doi.org/10.33763/finukr2019.03.073
26. Sandefur, T. (n. d.). Innovation: the description of process innovation by J. Schumpeter. Retrieved from www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Innovation.html
27. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton D. P. (2013). Balanced scorecard system. Moscow: Olimp-Biznes [in Russian].
28. Yegorov, I. Yu. (2016). System of Integrated Indicators for the Assessment of Scientific-Technical and Innovation Activities in the Context of European Integration. Science and Innovations, 4, 19–21. doi.org/10.15407/scin12.04.019
29. Imai, M. (2014). Gemba Kaizen: A commonsense, low-cost approach to management. Moscow: ALPINA PABLISHER [in Russian].
30. Knowledge-based economy (2009, September 9). OECD Glossary of Statistical Terms. Retrieved from stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=6864.
31. Kenton, W. (2019, May 6). Behavioural economy. Investopedia. Retrieved from www.investopedia.com/terms/b/behavioraleconomics.asp.
32. Demydenko, R. (2018). Initiation of project approach in the sphere of innovation development of national economy. Actual problems of management of social and economic systems, 49–50 [in Ukrainian].
33. Kaminska, O. S. (2019). State stimulation of the quality level of research work. RFI Scientific Papers, 4, 20–34. doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2019.04.020