Welcome to site of Scientific Works of NDFI (demo).
Login | Register
THE ACADEMY
OF FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
.

№ 4/2019

№ 4/2019

Nauk. pr. NDFI 2019 (4): 20–34
https://doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2019.04.020

FINANCES OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE

KAMINSKA Olena 1

1SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5859-5623


State stimulation of the quality level of research work


The article addresses the issue of state stimulation of research work. It is stated that stimulating science development is to undertake activities related to the satisfaction of the economic and social interests of organizations, enterprises and individual scientists who carry out basic and applied research and develop new highly efficient technique. Carrying out research is defined as creative and systematic work that is done to increase knowledge. State promotion of the qualitative level of the research results is carried out by direct and indirect methods. The key state instrument for supporting the activities of the public science sector, universities, regulating the development of science priority areas, technology and technology is budgetary funding of science. This method uses most middle- and low-income countries as the cheapest form of money allocation, which improves the institutional planning and management of research. Stimulating research is focused on increasing the efficiency of the scientific and innovation space, expanding the vertical and horizontal coordination of innovation policy and strengthening its regional level, redistribution of financial flows to create research infrastructure, human capital development and liberalization of the labor market to prevent the outflow commercialization of the research results and technological development, expansion of market demand for scientific development, strengthening of communication between academic science and production. Features of the state policy of stimulating science are related to the implementation of specific measures aimed at accelerating innovation development (various benefits, financial support, measures to improve the interaction of science and business), as well as the division of the role of the state and the private sector in these processes.

Keywords:science, stimulation, scientific research financing, quality of research

JEL: I21, I28


Kaminska O. . State stimulation of the quality level of research work / O. Kaminska // Наукові праці НДФІ. - 2019. - № 4. - C. 20-34.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 20 - 34) DownloadDownloads :313
1. Honcharenko, O. A. (2015). Forms and methods of state incentives of research and technical, innovative activity in EU member state. Law and Innovations, 4 (12). Retrieved from ndipzir.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Goncharenko12.pdf [in Ukrainian].
2. Lukinov, I. I. (1997). Economic transformation (late twentieth century). Kyiv: NAN Ukrainy, Instytut ekonomiky [in Ukrainian].
3. Mazur, Yu. A. (2015). Tax incentives for R&D in world practice and stimulation of innovations in Ukraine. Economy of Industry, 3, 5–20. Retrieved from irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/opac/search.exe?I21DBN=LINK&P21DBN=UJRN&Z21ID=&S21REF=10&S21CNR=20&S21STN=1&S21FMT=ASP_meta&C21COM=S&2_S21P03=FILA=&2_S21STR=econpr%5F2015%5F3%5F3 [in Russian].
4. Yehorov, I. Yu. (2014). Assessment of the results of scientific activity: traditional approaches and new challenges. Science and Science of Science, 3, 42–47 [in Ukrainian].
5. Kryvorotko, I. O. (2013). Study foreign experience staff motivation for a Ukrainian conditions. State and regions. Series: Economics and Business, 2, 151–154 [in Ukrainian].
6. Spivakovskyi, O. (2017, November 15). Science reform is the basis of state development. Voice of Ukraine. Retrieved from www.golos.com.ua/article/295977 [in Ukrainian].
7. Sopilniak, A. V. (2015). Project financing: problems and prospects in Ukraine. Young Scientist, 2, 70–74. Retrieved from molodyvcheny.in.ua/files/journal/2015/2/130.pdf [in Ukrainian].
8. Taylor, F. W. (n. d.). The Principles of Scientific Management. Retrieved from infotour.in.ua/tailor1.htm [in Ukrainian].
9. Cherleniak, I. I., Bondarenko, V. M., & Berezhanskyi, M. M. (2013). Analysis of innovative development programs in the countries of the European Union. Actual problems of international relations, 117 (2), 110–116. Retrieved from www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?I21DBN=LINK&P21DBN=UJRN&Z21ID=&S21REF=10&S21CNR=20&S21STN=1&S21FMT=ASP_meta&C21COM=S&2_S21P03=FILA=&2_S21STR=apmv_2013_117(2)__16 [in Ukrainian].
10. Congressional Research Service. (2019, August 13). Federal Research and Development (R&D) Funding: FY2020. Retrieved from fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45715.pdf.
11. OECD. (1997). National Innovation Systems. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/science/inno/2101733.pdf.
12. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. Retrieved from sdg.org.ua/ua/resources-2/344-2030-2015 [in Ukrainian].
13. OECD. (2018). OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2018. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/sti/Brochure_STIO_2018_web.pdf.
14. Jacob, M. (n. d.). Research funding instruments and modalities: Implication for developing countries. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/sti/Draft_Report_public_funding_instrument_final.pdf.
15. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2015). About scientific and scientific-technical activity (Act No. 848-VIII, November 26). Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/848-19 [in Ukrainian].
16. Khrystynchenko, N. P. (2015). Current state of financing of scientific activity in Ukraine. Bulletin of Chernivtsi faculty of National University “Odessa Law Academy”, 4, 226–235 [in Ukrainian].
17. Lozovyi, V. S. (2013). Application of the project approach in the field of science as a resource of modernization and development of Ukraine. Retrieved from old2.niss.gov.ua/articles/1225/ [in Ukrainian].
18. Huzenko, I. Yu. (2017). Features of the scientific and technical policy of the leading countries of the world in globalization conditions. Economics Bulletin, 3, 37–46. Retrieved from ev.nmu.org.ua/docs/2017/3/EV20173_037-046.pdf [in Ukrainian].
19. Zianko, V. V. (2008). Taxes as a means of increasing the activity of innovative entrepreneurship. Scientific bulletin of the National University of State Tax Service of Ukraine (economics, law), 2 (41), 107–112. Retrieved from fk.vntu.edu.ua/images/documents/irpin_08.pdf [in Ukrainian].
20. Voitko, S. V., Mialo, N. S., Shysholin, A. P. (2014). Comparative analysis of methods of stimulating research in different countries of the world. Retrieved from ktpu.kpi.ua/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/05-Vojtko-Myalo-SHisholin.pdf [in Ukrainian].
21. Vakim, V. E. (2017). Stimulation of innovative activities: comparative and legal aspect. Economic Theory and Law, 2 (29). Retrieved from econtlaw.nlu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/134-145.pdf [in Ukrainian].
22. Alieksieiev, I. V., Zhelizniak, R. Y. (2012). European experience tax stimulation of innovation activity. Retrieved from ena.lp.edu.ua:8080/bitstream/ntb/14096/1/3_7-16_Vis_725_Ekonomika.pdf [in Ukrainian].
23. Klavdienko, V. (2018). Tax incentives for enterprise innovation in China. Retrieved from inecon.org/docs/2018/Klavdienko_SE_7_2018.pdf [in Russian].
24. OECD. (2018, April 18). OECD Review of National R&D Tax Incentives and Estimates of R&D Tax Subsidyrates 2017. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/sti/rd-tax-stats-design-subsidy.pdf.
25. Salamatina, S. Yu. (2017). Analysis of the European experience of innovative development of the national economy. Retrieved from cyberleninka.ru/article/n/analiz-evropeyskogo-opyta-innovatsionnogo-razvitiya-natsionalnoy-ekonomiki [in Russian].
26. Review of international innovation development experience. (2011). Nano News Net. Retrieved from www.nanonewsnet.ru/articles/2011/obzor-mezhdunarodnogo-opyta-innovatsionnogo-razvitiya [in Russian].
27. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (n. d.). Horizon 2020. Retrieved from mon.gov.ua/ua/tag/gorizont-2020 [in Ukrainian].