№ 3/2018

№ 3/2018

Nauk. pr. NDFI 2018 (3): 5–17https://doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2018.03.005

FINANCES OF THE INSTITUTIONAL SECTORS

GASANOV Sergіi ¹

¹SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7454-0419

Research and development (R&D) in the national economy structure: international comparisons methodology

The article discusses the current problems of the methodology of international comparisons of the research and development (R&D) sector in the structure of the national economy. Research and development are those types of economic activity that reflect the evolution of the division of labor and gradually change labor itself, contributing to its synthesis with capital. The concept of identifying the knowledge production and distribution sector in the structure of the national economy by type of economic activity (“professional, scientific and technical activities”, “information and telecommunications”, “education”) is presented. The R&D sector is important but not the only component of the structure of knowledge production and distribution (along with education, training, media communications and information services sectors). The article reveals the main directions of international comparisons of the R&D sector in the structure of national economies: the R&D sector identification in the structure of economic activities and the institutional structure of the economy; assessment of the scale of production factors involved in the R&D sector, first of all, the “labor” factor; measuring the volume of financial flows of the R&D sector from relevant sources; determining the economic and social performance of the R&D sector and its contribution to the gross value added generated in the national economy. Cross-country comparisons of the role of the knowledge production and distribution sector in the created gross value added in the economies of Ukraine and some other countries for the period 2010-2016 are made. The author substantiates the need to make changes to the international and national Classifications of types of economic activity in order to further differentiate scientific research and development as an independent section of this Classifications. This will contribute to a clearer identification of the R&D sector in the structure of the national economy.

Keywords:research and development (R&D), economy structure, types of economic activity, production of knowledge, knowledge based capital, R&D measurement indicators, international comparisons

JEL: О32, О38

Gasanov S. . Research and development (R&D) in the national economy structure: international comparisons methodology / S. . Gasanov // Наукові праці НДФІ. - 2018. - № 3. - C. 5-17.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 5 - 17)

Download

Downloads :779

1. OECD. (2013). Supporting Investment in Knowledge Capital, Growth and Innovation.
doi.org/10.1787/9789264193307-en

2. Corrado, C., Haltiwanger, J., & Sichel, D. (Eds). (2005). Measuring Capital in a New Economy. National Bureau of Economic Research: University of Chicago Press.
doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226116174.001.0001

3. Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan and Co. eet.pixel-online.org/files/etranslation/original/Marshall,%20Principles%20of%20Economics.pdf.

4. Machlup, F. (1962). The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States. Princeton University Press.

5. Baumol, W. J., Nelson, R. R., & Wolff, E. N. (Eds.). (1994). Convergence of productivity: Cross-national studies and historical evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.

6. Coe, D., Helpman, E., & Hoffmaister, A. (2008). International R&D Spillovers and Institutions. International Monetary Fund.
doi.org/10.3386/w14069

7. Griliches, Z. (1998). R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence. University of Chicago Press.
doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226308906.001.0001

8. Griliches, Z. (Ed.). (1984). R&D, Patents and Productivity. University of Chicago Press.
doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226308920.001.0001

9. Mansfield, E. (1968). Industrial Research and Technological Innovation. W. W. Norton, Incorporated.

10. Hall, B., Rosenberg, N. (Eds). (2010). Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vols. 1-2). North Holland: Elsevier.

11. Link, A., Scott, J. (2013). The theory and practice of public-sector R&D economic impact analysis. In Handbook on the Theory and Practice of Program Evaluation (pp. 15-55). Edward Elgar.
doi.org/10.4337/9780857932402.00007

12. Scott, T., Scott, J. (2015). Standards and innovation: US public/private partnerships to support technology-based economic growth. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 24, Iss. 5, 457-489.
doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2014.988516

13. Amosha, O. I., Zemlianikin, A. I., & Pidorycheva, I. Yu. (Eds.). (2015). Improving the innovation management system as a condition for accelerating structural reforms in Ukraine. Economy of Ukraine, 9, 49-65 [in Ukrainian].

14. Amosha, O. I., Dzhvihol, H., & Miskievich, R. (Eds.). (2018). Innovative industrial enterprise in the formation of sustainable development. Kyiv: Institute of Industrial Economics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].

15. Heiets, V. M. (Ed.). (2015). Innovative Ukraine 2020 (National Report). Kyiv: Institute of Economics and Forecasting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].

16. Yehorov, I. Yu. (2015). Innovative Ukraine 2020: the main provisions of the National Report. Economy of Ukraine, 9, 4-18 [in Ukrainian].

17. Yehorov, I. Yu. (2016). Innovation scoreboard of the EU and determination of the place in it of Ukraine. Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 5, 87-91 [in Ukrainian].

18. Erocal, D., Yegorov, I. (2015). Countries in the Black Sea basin. UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030, pp. 313-341. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

19. OECD. (2015). Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. Paris: OECD Publishing.
doi.org/10.1787/9789264239012-en

20. United Nations. (2009). System of National Accounts. New York.

21. OECD, Eurostat. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation (4th ed.).
doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en.

22. OECD, Eurostat. (1995). Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities: Manual on the Measurement of Human Resources Devoted to S&T - Canberra Manual.
doi.org/10.1787/9789264065581-en

23. United Nations. (2008). International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC), Rev. 4. Retrieved from unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/seriesM/seriesm_4rev4e.pdf.

24. State Committee of Ukraine for Technical Regulation and Consumer Policy. (2010). Classification of types of economic activity. National Classifier of Ukraine. DK 009: 2010 [in Ukrainian].

25. European Communities, Eurostat. (2008). NACE Rev. 2 - Statistical classification of economic activites in the European Community.

26. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2018). National Accounts of Ukraine for 2016. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

27. United Nations. (2018). National Accounts Statistics: Main Aggregates and Detailed Tables, 2017. New York.