Welcome to site of Scientific Works of NDFI (demo).

№ 2/2021

Nauk. pr. NDFI 2021 (2): 146–159https://doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2021.02.146

ACCOUNTING AND TAXATION

¹Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1537-4841

International experience and common errors in protecting of confidentiality, protection and use of CbC reporting information

Within the OECD, where governments are working together to address important issues of globalization, efforts are also being made to help OECD member countries respond more quickly to new challenges, one of which is to ensure the confidentiality and proper use of information. The OECD provides governments with the opportunity to share experiences in implementing administrative policy, to seek answers to common problems, to identify best practices and to coordinate activities in the context of these issues. The study of issues related to ensuring confidentiality, protection and use of reporting information between countries (Country-by-country, hereinafter - CbC) in the article is considered from the standpoint of international experience, in the context of this issue. For Ukraine as a post-Soviet country, the study of relevant experience is presented by such countries as Georgia, Kazakhstan and Russia. The analysis of international experience in ensuring confidentiality and the appropriate level of protection of information that is the subject of exchange between OECD member countries as part of the implementation of the BEPS Action Plan. The research is based on a combination of general scientific methods, comparison methods and an empirical approach. A summary of the national regulations of the countries in question is made, which contain provisions on confidentiality, data protection and proper use of information Country-by-country reports. Based on the results of the study, it has been proven that different tax administrations should, in practice, have different approaches to ensure the required level of effective protection of confidentiality of country-by-country reports information and establish penalties for breach of confidentiality.

Keywords:BEPS, protection of information, confidential information, exchange of tax information, Country-by-Country Reports

JEL: Н29

Chukhraieva N. . International experience and common errors in protecting of confidentiality, protection and use of CbC reporting information / N. Chukhraieva // Наукові праці НДФІ. - 2021. - № 2. - C. 146-159.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 146 - 159)

Download

Downloads :95

1. Aleksentsev, A. (2003). Confidential office work. Moscow: Personnel Management [in Russian].
2. Fatyanov, A. A. (2010). Problems of protection of confidential information that does not constitute a state secret. Information society, 5, 49–56 [in Russian].
3. Shadnaya, M. A. (2015). Confidential information: concept, types and level. Retrieved from cyberleninka.ru/article/n/konfidentsialnaya-informatsiya-ponyatie-vidy-i-uroven/viewer [in Russian].
4. Albrecht, J. Ph., & Jotzo, F. (2017). Das Neue Datenschutzrecht der EU. Nomos.
5. Dessemontet, F. (1996). Arbitration and confidentiality. The American Review of International Arbitration, 7 (3-4). Retrieved from www.unil.ch/files/live/sites/cedidac/files/Articles/Arbitration%20%26%20Confidentiality.pdf
6. Mercer, S. (2020). The Limitations of Europe an Data Protection as a Model for Global Privacy Regulation. AJIL Unbound, 114, 20–25. doi.org/10.1017/aju.2019.83
7. McCormack, T., & Simpson, G. J. (1995). A New International Criminal Law Regime. Netherlands International Law Review, 4 (2), 177–206. doi.org/10.1017/S0165070X00003545
8. Heverly, R. (2019). More Is Different: Tort Liability of Compromised Systems in Internet Denial of Service Attacks. Retrieved from heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/flsulr47&div=24&id=&page=.
9. Jaeger, M. C. (2011, November 29 – December 1). A cloud environment for data-intensive storage services. In IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom 2011, Athens, Greece), p. 357–366. doi.org/10.1109/CloudCom.2011.55
10. Prashant Reddy, T. (2018, May 17). Should There Be a “Developing Country” Template for Data Protection Legislation? Retrieved from thewire.in/tech/should-there-be-a-developing-country-template-for-data-protection-legislation.
11. OECD guidelines. (n. d.). Retrieved from cyberpeace.org.ua/files/3_2_2.pdf [in Russian].
12. OECD. (2014). Standard for Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information in Tax Matters. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi.org/10.1787/9789264216525-en
13. OECD. (2018). Standard for Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information in Tax Matters (Implementation Handbook). Retrieved from www.oecd.org/tax/exchange-of-tax-information/implementation-handbook-standard-for-automatic-exchange-of-financial-account-information-in-tax-matters.htm.
14. OECD. (2010). Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital and its Commentary. In Implementing the Tax Transparency Standards: A Handbook for Assessors and Jurisdictions. Retrieved from read.oecd-ilibrary.org/taxation/implementing-the-tax-transparency-standards/article-26-of-the-oecd-model-tax-convention-on-income-and-on-capital-and-its-commentary_9789264088016-6-en#page1.
15. Parliament of Georgia. (1997). On international treaties of Georgia (Act No. 924, October 16). Retrieved from images.policy.mofcom.gov.cn/flaw/200904/02878a2a-16f6-47a4-bdb9-498a2aad12b2.pdf [in Russian].
16. Parliament of Georgia. (1995). Constitution of Georgia (Act No. 786, August 24). Retrieved from matsne.gov.ge/ru/document/view/30346?publication=36 [in Russian].
17. Parliament of Georgia. (2010). Tax Code of Georgia (Act No. 3591, September 17). Retrieved from matsne.gov.ge/ru/document/view/1043717?publication=173 [in Russian].
18. Parliament of Georgia. (1999). Criminal Code of Georgia (Act No. 2287, July 22). Retrieved from matsne.gov.ge/ru/document/view/16426?publication=229 [in Russian].
19. Parliament of Georgia. (1999). Administrative Procedure Code of Georgia (Act No. 2352, July 23). Retrieved from matsne.gov.ge/ru/document/view/16492?publication=83 [in Russian].
20. OECD. (2020, July 16). Global Forum on transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes. Georgia commits to implement international standard on automatic exchange of financial information by 2023. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/tax/transparency/documents/georgia-commits-to-implement-international-standard-on-automatic-exchange-of-financial-information-by-2023.htm.
21. OECD. (2015). Phase 1: Legal and Regulatory Framework, OECD Publishing. In Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes Peer Reviews: Kazakhstan 2015. Retrieved from read.oecd-ilibrary.org/taxation/global-forum-on-transparency-and-exchange-of-information-for-tax-purposes-peer-reviews-kazakhstan-2015_9789264233560-en#page71.
22. Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2008). On taxes and other obligatory payments to the budget (Tax Code) (Act No. 99-IV, December 10). Retrieved from online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=30366217#pos=223;-60 [in Russian].
23. Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2008). About access to information (Act No. 401-V, November 16). Retrieved from online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=39415981#pos=294;-42 [in Russian].
24. Legal Information Service of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (n. d.). Retrieved from adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K080000099_#z5491 [in Russian].
25. Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2004). On approval of the rules of electronic document management (Decree No. 430, April 17). Retrieved from adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P040000430_ [in Russian].