Welcome to site of Scientific Works of NDFI (demo).

№ 3/2020

Nauk. pr. NDFI 2020 (3): 109–127https://doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2020.03.109

FINANCES OF THE INSTITUTIONAL SECTORS

¹SESE “The Academy of Financial Management”
OrcID ID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2226-2795

Analysis of Japan’s and Ukraine’s sectoral structure of the economy within the framework of the aggregated input-output models

The sectoral structure of the economies of Japan and Ukraine is studied. The aggregation of the input-output table of Japan’s economy (2015) to 13 constipated industries, which have traditionally been used for a long time for the analysis of the Japanese economic structure, and the input-output table of Ukraine’s economy (2018) to 10 sectors were carried out. For a more comparable comparison of the input-output tables of both economies was aggregated to the level of 3 constipated sectors (primary, secondary and tertiary). The analysis of production processes for the economy as a whole and in terms of sectors was conducted, the structure of sectoral costs and generateable income (gross value added, factor income) was investigated. The author worked out a matrix of direct costs, built heat maps, etc. Analysis based on aggregated release cost tables, including 3 sectoral input-output tables, is useful for initial familiarization with the peculiarities of inter-sectoral relationships, final demand structure and added value, peculiarities of production processes. Being quite simplified, they reflect the basic content of processes in the production sphere, can be used for educationally methodical purposes, in the development of a strategy for modernization of production, to be the basis for comparing production systems of different national economies. Further research is appropriate within more detailed input-output tables, where the classification of types of economic activity and the degree of data aggregation meets international standards.

Keywords:sectoral structure of the economy, economy of Japan, economy of Ukraine, input-output table, types of economic activity, production, data aggregation, structural analysis, comparison of economic systems

JEL: C13, C67, D57, E23

Kulyk V. . Analysis of Japan’s and Ukraine’s sectoral structure of the economy within the framework of the aggregated input-output models / V. Kulyk // Наукові праці НДФІ. - 2020. - № 3. - C. 109-127.

Article original in Ukrainian (pp. 109 - 127)

Download

Downloads :566

1. Eurostat. (2008). Eurostat Manual of Supply, Use and Input-Output Tables. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
2. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications [JP]. (n. d.). Input-Output Tables for Japan. Retrieved from www.soumu.go.jp/english/dgpp_ss/data/io/index.htm.
3. Mitsuaki, O. (Ed.). (1995). The Structure of the Japanese Economy: Changes on the Domestic and International Fronts. Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23721-0
4. Leontiev, V., Chenery, H., Clark, P. et al. (1958). Research of the structure of the American economy: Theoretical and empirical analysis according to the scheme: input-output. Moscow: Gosstatizdat [in Russian].
5. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications [JP]. (n. d.). Role of the Director-General for Policy Planning (Statistical Standards). Retrieved from www.soumu.go.jp/english/dgpp_ss/seido/guide/2011ver/07.htm.
6. Morishsima, M. (1972). Equilibrium, Resilience, Growth: A Multisectoral Analysis. Moscow: Science [in Russian].
7. Tsukui, J., & Murakami, Y. (1979). Turnpike Optimality in Input-output Systems: Theory and Application for Planning. Amsterdam: Holland North Publishing Company.
8. Kuboniva, M., Tabata, M., Tabata, S., & Hasebe, Y. (1991). Mathematical economics on a personal computer. Moscow: Finance and Statistics [in Russian].
9. Planning Bureau, Government of Japan. (1999). Multi-Sectoral Economic Models for Medium and Long-term Analysis. Econometric Model Analysis Section. Tokyo: Economic Planning Agency.
10. United Nations. (2020). National Accounts Statistics: Main Aggregates and Detailed Tables, 2019, I–V. New York. Retrieved from unstats.un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/sdPubs/MADT-2019.pdf.
11. United Nations. (2020). National Accounts Statistics: Analysis of Main Aggregates, 2018. New York.
12. Journal of the International Input-Output Association. (n. d.). Retrieved from www.iioa.org/journal/journal.html.
13. Journal of Economic Structures. (n. d.). Retrieved from journalofeconomic
structures.springeropen.com.
14. Input-Output Analysis. (n. d.). Retrieved from www.jstage.jst.go.jp/browse/papaios/-char/en.
15. Arkhangelskyi, Yu. S., & Kovalenko, I. I. (1998). Fundamentals of modeling of interbranch relations. Kyiv: RVU KIEMBS [in Ukrainian].
16. Lyashenko, I. M. (1999). Economic and mathematical methods and models of sustainable development. Kyiv: Higher school [in Ukrainian].
17. Lyashenko, O. I. (2013). Inter-branch models of multi-structural economy. The Problems of Economy, 2, 226–229. Retrieved from www.problecon.com/export_pdf/problems-of-economy-2013-2_0-pages-226_229.pdf [in Ukrainian].
18. Kudin, V. I., & Onyschenko, A. M. (2016). Modelling of technological changes in “input-output” balance model in terms of the paris agreement. Ekonomichnyy analiz, 25 (1), 37–44. Retrieved from www.econa.org.ua/index.php/econa/article/view/1190 [in Ukrainian].
19. Onyschenko, A. M., & Kudin, V. I. (2017). Intersectoral balance scheme “cost-output” in terms of innovation policy of the Paris Agreement. Economic and mathematical modeling of socio-economic systems, 22, 61–81 [in Ukrainian].
20. Yastremskyi, O. (2017). Uncertainty in input-output scheme: comparative inter-country analysis. RFI Scientific Papers, 3, 21–35 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2017.03.021
21. Yastremskii, O. (2018). Key and effective economic activities of ukraine. Herald of the Economic Sciences of Ukraine, 2, 177–182. Retrieved from www.venu-journal.org/download/2018/2/31-Iastremskyi.pdf [in Ukrainian].
22. Yastremskii, O. (2020). Input–output productivity–cost analysis of the economy of ukraine: selected cross-countries and intertemporal comparison. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 56 (4), 85–97 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.1007/s10559-020-00276-z
23. Yastremskii, O. I., & Kulyk, V. V. (2020). The Total Load of Emissions on the Final Demand in the Aggregated Interbranch Model of Ukraine. The Problems of Economy, 2, 166–174 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2020-2-166-174
24. Yastremsky O., & Kulyk V. (2020). Volatility of the structure of intersectoral relations of ukraine’s economy. Economy and forecasting, 2, 61–79 [in Ukrainian]. doi.org/10.15407/eip2020.02.061
25. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2020). Cost-issue table (in basic prices) of Ukraine for 2018. Kyiv. Retrieved from www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/2020/zb/05/zb_tvv_18.pdf [in Ukrainian].
26. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2016). National accounts of Ukraine for 2015. Kyiv. Retrieved from www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/2016/bl/12/bl_nr_2015.zip [in Ukrainian].
27. Kulik, V. V. (2016). Macroeconomic proportions and structural changes in the economy of Moldova and its neighbors in the context of the general economic equilibrium model. Mathematical modeling, optimization and information technology, 2, 233–248. Chisinau: Evrica: ATIC [in Russian].
28. European Parliament, & Council. (2013, June 26). Regulation (EU) No. 549/2013 of the of 21 May 2013 on the European system of national and regional accounts in the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, 56.
29. Input-output table, 2016 (Revision 2019), at basic prices - domestic output and imports. (n. d.). Retrieved from www.destatis.de/EN/Themes/Economy/National-Accounts-Domestic-Product/Tables/input-output-accounts.html.
30. The Japanese economy and the 2005 input-output tables. (n. d.). Retrieved from www.soumu.go.jp/main_content/000327476.pdf.
31. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2016). Methodological provisions for organizing the sovereign statistical caution “Table “vitrati-issue” (Order No. 326, November 1). Retrieved from www.ukrstat.gov.ua/metod_polog/metod_doc/2018/236/mp_tvv.pdf [in Ukrainian].
32. Leontiev, V. V. (2006). General economic problems of intersectoral analysis. Selected works (in 3 Vols.), 1. Moscow: Economics [in Russian].
33. Wikipedia. (n. d.). Economic sector. Retrieved from uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/ [in Ukrainian].